|
- 帖子
- 112
- 积分
- 214
- 球员
- C罗
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 最后登录
- 2009-2-15
|
弗格森逃过起诉Ferguson to escape charge after his ref rant
Last updated at 20:37pm on 9th November 2007
% k* [7 y& E1 I" x" g, ?曼联,曼联BT,曼联在线视频,曼联图片,曼联新闻,曼联论坛 
& J2 @' { [- m $ M- R* k3 C7 x4 A- a/ M/ R# Q
Sir Alex Ferguson will not be charged by the FA for suggesting that referee Howard Webb favoured Arsenal in last weekend's 2-2 draw with Manchester United at the Emirates Stadium.
, m7 b' u6 ~, W2 P% X/ U& N专业曼联球迷网站,曼联球迷的地盘,为广大球迷提供最新曼联新闻与视频资源.Disciplinary chiefs have been studying Ferguson's remarks after calling for a transcript of an interview that appeared on United's in-house MUTV station.
- {$ v6 h/ w# B& t# j2 K5 F+ r专业曼联球迷网站,曼联球迷的地盘,为广大球迷提供最新曼联新闻与视频资源.But it is understood that officials at Soho Square decided there was not enough evidence to charge the United manager as it could not be proved that Ferguson was suggesting that Webb had been deliberately biased.
5 L: C) D; H7 e$ c曼联,曼联BT,曼联在线视频,曼联图片,曼联新闻,曼联论坛The FA have privately acknowledged for some time that Ferguson has a knack for taking his comments to the wire without quite crossing into actionable territory. Last night former referee and Sportsmail columnist Graham Poll said: 'I'm not surprised and I say that because the FA have a habit of punishing the small clubs and not the big ones. This is just dispiriting for referees. Of course, it is. 'If managers say a referee was rubbish or that he gave a penalty that wasn't the referees haven't got a problem with that. www.imanutd.com+ Z7 ]1 y7 Y5 a% k& ^$ v! X2 {7 |
'But if a manager says “he favoured the other team”, then that is where the integrity of referees is being called into question and it must be defended vigorously. 'This is not about Sir Alex Ferguson. It is about the FA. That is where the problem lies.' By common consent, Webb had an excellent game last weekend and has been praised for his performance — in contrast to the recent display by Mark Clattenburg that led to similar accusations by David Moyes after Everton's defeat to Liverpool.
9 e+ a! C8 ?+ Y- j( z9 j+ l4 z Hwww.imanutd.comWhile Moyes, too, is expected to be let off even though that file has not been officially closed, the FA had a stronger case against Ferguson — who said Webb 'favoured Arsenal at times' — because the referee could hardly be faulted. 曼联在线·球迷地带" s2 B! V) @3 u; h
曼联在线·球迷地带5 Z$ V, X4 ]4 H: J4 a: |- e& j) Y6 g
- 专业·专注·曼联中文网站2 A& ~; }6 e! Z) u: G
曼联在线·球迷地带& a6 e$ S0 ] c0 E: q2 [
英足总不会控告福格森爵士诽谤罪名。曼联在线·球迷地带& E; }: \* ]8 j
爵爷曾出言指责裁判霍华德-韦伯偏袒阿森纳从而导致曼联在酋长体育场与枪手2-2战平。
+ C" {- E4 x" U7 ^6 @ |+ K英足总纪律委员会官员仔细研究了爵爷在MUTV上的讲话录像后作出了这样的决定。曼联,曼联BT,曼联在线视频,曼联图片,曼联新闻,曼联论坛, ]) ]) T( A( V* ~& N0 N/ y3 h
这个决定可以理解，SOHO广场的足协总部官员认为没有足够证据认为弗格森曾指责韦伯是有意而为之。
$ c: X: B# m' E' }) k1 ^( Q" Q& r - 专业·专注·曼联中文网站英足总很清楚爵爷，他总是对媒体口无遮拦却有诀窍让人没有办法指控他。9 S. y0 y$ _ x
昨天晚上，前裁判现为专栏作家的格雷厄姆-波尔认为：“我对此并不惊讶，我认为他们这样在做因为足协习惯了总是惩罚小俱乐部，而对大俱乐部很宽松。这样做会让裁判气馁。 - 专业·专注·曼联中文网站" f+ y5 g8 F) D. Q* `' V
“如果教练说裁判是垃圾，或者他给错了点球，那和其它裁判无关。2 \1 G# ]! n0 Y2 \1 r1 ?; D
“但若他说的是裁判‘偏袒某支队伍’，那就是指责整个裁判组了，裁判们应该坚决为自己辩护。 G" h" I1 n% k, E& d5 g" E/ J
“这不是针对弗格森爵士个人，而是针对英足总，那才是问题所在关键。”专业曼联球迷网站,曼联球迷的地盘,为广大球迷提供最新曼联新闻与视频资源.4 I: ~# o! j" o4 _/ F
大家却基本同意韦伯在上周的比赛中表现得还不错，这与之前埃弗顿主帅大卫-莫耶斯在败给利物浦之后指责裁判马克-克拉登伯格的情况不同。
$ D B& K) E cwww.imanutd.com然而莫耶斯也很可能被饶过指控，不过官方文件还未下达。足协对弗格森爵士的事件——他说韦伯“偏心利物浦”——更为关注因为裁判不该被找岔子。
0 {) y* q, j: @) v: w4 y; A - 专业·专注·曼联中文网站 |
|
发表于 2007-11-10 15:53
| 
发表于 2007-11-10 16:00
| 
